<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>mikepk - Latest Comments in Scoble Feedback</title><link>http://mikepk.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://mikepk.disqus.com/scoble_feedback_52/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:25:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Scoble Feedback</title><link>https://mikepk.com/2008/06/scoble-feedback/#comment-571586</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, we're not a really like Twitter in the services we're currently offering. Grazr is basically a system for collecting information, blending it together into streams, filtering it, and allowing you to republish it (using widgets) on other pages.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Grazr and Twitter are similar in some basic behind-the-scenes kinds of ways. We both deal with lots of user generated data, blended together and then presented in time sorted streams (very much like Twitter in that respect).  Unlike twitter, we're not a place to post. Since we're not the source of that data we have to collect the feeds from all over the web, making it in some respects a harder problem.  We also deal with a lot more data than Twitter since we aggregate the full content of feeds in those streams. One place where our job is easier is that, unlike Twitter, we're not aiming for real-time delivery of the data.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mikepk</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 09:25:27 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Scoble Feedback</title><link>https://mikepk.com/2008/06/scoble-feedback/#comment-571214</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi Mike. I don't understand: Grazr is really different to Twitter, true? :-)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Dario Salvelli</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 02 Jun 2008 07:43:37 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>